Mud Tire Comparisons

Head to head · Index

Mud Tire Comparisons

Every head-to-head on this site, with the one difference each pairing actually turns on. None of them names a winner: where the published data favours one tire, the page says on what, and where the evidence runs out, it says that too.

By Bill Belcamino · Last updated 17 September 2026

Every head-to-head

Eighteen pairings across eleven tires. Specifications on every page come from named sources — the manufacturer, a retailer listing, or the single-source specification database — and each figure is attributed where it appears.

Comparison

What it turns on

BFGoodrich KM3 vs Nitto Trail Grappler

The two publish different claims against different baselines; no ranking is possible

BFGoodrich KM3 vs Toyo Open Country M/T

A written warranty term against the highest composite rating; the Toyo lists 3/32″ more tread in 33s

BFGoodrich KM3 vs Maxxis RAZR MT

In 37s the Maxxis is a higher load range, not a stronger tire; its advertised warranty could not be verified

BFGoodrich KM3 vs KO2

Snow certification and a 50,000-mile warranty against 3/32″ more tread

BFGoodrich KM3 vs Mickey Thompson Baja Boss M/T

Deeper tread against a higher load range in 33s and 35s

BFGoodrich KM3 vs Cooper Discoverer STT Pro

The Cooper is lighter and deeper in every matched size

Falken Wildpeak M/T vs BFGoodrich KM3

Deeper, lighter and a stated construction, plus a documented load-rating discrepancy

Nitto Trail Grappler vs Toyo Open Country M/T

A published noise figure against a composite rating

Nitto Trail Grappler vs Falken Wildpeak M/T

The only pairing where both manufacturers publish their casing

Nitto Trail Grappler vs Mud Grappler

Nitto’s own ratings for both, and the baseline behind the Trail Grappler’s noise claim

Nitto Trail Grappler vs Ridge Grappler

Nitto rates the hybrid higher on pavement; neither has a treadwear warranty

Maxxis RAZR MT vs Nitto Trail Grappler

Near-identical in LT285/70R17; only one publishes a ply count

Falken Wildpeak M/T vs Toyo Open Country M/T

Stated construction and depth against the higher composite rating

Falken Wildpeak M/T vs Maxxis RAZR MT

Only Falken states its construction; the “3-ply RAZR” traces to retailer listings

Toyo Open Country M/T vs R/T

A 45,000-mile warranty against depth and Toyo’s own higher off-road score

Goodyear Wrangler MT/R vs Toyo Open Country M/T

Load-range choice, and whether your size is still made

Milestar Patagonia M/T-02 vs BFGoodrich KM3

$79 a tire cheaper and lighter, but a lower load range in 33s

Milestar Patagonia M/T-02 vs Toyo Open Country M/T

The cheapest and most expensive tires we track: 61% of the price

Comparing categories rather than models

Mud-terrain vs all-terrain · Rugged-terrain vs mud-terrain · Mud tires for daily driving · Budget mud tires

How these comparisons are made

A manufacturer’s claim is labelled as a claim, with the baseline it was measured against. Size figures are compared in matched sizes and, where possible, matched load ranges — and where two tires are listed in different load ranges, the page says so, because a lighter tire in a lower load range is not the same finding as a lighter tire. The full method is on how we work.

Model pages: BFGoodrich KM3 · Nitto Trail Grappler · Toyo Open Country M/T · Falken Wildpeak M/T · Maxxis RAZR MT